August
6, 2012
Texas
Runoff Becomes Stage for Tea Party Tango
But Scattered Setbacks Prevent Landslide on Right
Conservatives Take Top Prize in Grand Slam Fashion with Cruz
Victory
as Competing GOP Factions and Democrat Who Strayed Take Honors
By
Mike Hailey
Capitol Inside Editor
The
perfect storm began brewing more than a year ago when Republican
state lawmakers approved redistricting plans that they knew
Democrats would challenge in court with some degree of success.
But the Republicans correctly assumed that they'd come out
ahead in the battle over legislative and congressional boundaries
even if a Democratic Party that had one foot in the grave
in Texas managed to cut its losses at the federal courthouse.
What the
largest GOP majority of all time in the Texas Legislature
didn't realize at the time was that they'd set the stage for
a 2012 primary election that would unfold in a way that no
one at the Capitol could have possibly imagined when they
cast their votes in the map battle. Not a soul under the pink
granite dome back in the 2011 suspected that the most powerful
legislative leader in the state - Republican Lieutenant Governor
David Dewhurst - would be planting the seeds for the demise
of the U.S. Senate campaign he was planning to run when he
gave his blessing to the remap package that Democrats were
branding as blatantly illegal.
If anyone
who'd been involved in state government could peer far enough
into the future to see the potential impact that redistricting
could have on the primary election and its timing in particular,
it might have been a former appellate lawyer for the state
named Ted Cruz. But Cruz didn't bother to tell anyone if he
had the slightest clue that the legal fight on the new maps
would string out the primary election in a way that would
give his longshot U.S. Senate campaign an actual shot at winning.
Cruz - after all - isn't a prophet even when it looks like
he's walking on water like he did when he capped off the underdog
race of all-time in Texas with a victory this week in a U.S.
Senate Republican runoff that Dewhurst had been an all but
prohibitive favorite to win a few months ago.
While
Cruz may have surpassed Sarah Palin as the tea party's number
one superstar at the national level, he made history in all
sorts of ways here at home. The former state solicitor general
- for starters - will become the first Hispanic to ever serve
in one of the two highest-ranking elected posts in the state.
That milestone is all the more incredible when considering
that Cruz is a member of the GOP in a state where most Hispanics
are still Democrats - and he's a conservative Republican on
top of that in a party in which the vast majority of Latinos
are moderates. And if that's not enough - Cruz is an American
of Cuban descent unlike the lion's share of Hispanics in Texas
whose genealogy has roots in Mexico.
But the
most landmark accomplishment of all - more significant even
than the magnitude of the odds that the GOP nominee for U.S.
Senate overcame - is arguably the page of history that Cruz
will write when he beats Democratic nominee Paul Sadler in
the general election. Cruz is on track to become the first
Texan since the 1800s to win a U.S. Senate seat in his debut
as a candidate on the ballot. Barring a miraculous upset this
fall, Cruz will become the second U.S. senator from Texas
who's never held another elected office. While John Tower's
first and only elected post was U.S. senator - a job that
he won in a 1961 special election that broke the Democrats'
stranglehold on statewide offices here - he'd unsuccessfully
challenged Democratic incumbent Lyndon B. Johnson several
months before the Republican's historic election.
From there
you can rewind all the way to back to 1875 when Samuel Maxey
was elected to the U.S. Senate as his first elective position.
But Maxey, a former Confederate general who served 12 years
in the upper house of Congress, was elected to the job by
the Texas Legislature. And Maxey had lost a race for the U.S.
House in the Democratic primary three years before state lawmakers
sent him to Washington. Morgan C. Hamilton - the last Texan
to win a U.S. Senate seat the first time he ran for elected
office - had experience in government as an appointed state
comptroller and high-ranking official in the Republic of Texas
war department before his election as a U.S. senator in 1870
amid the fallout from Reconstruction.
Hamilton
was an abolitionist who'd fought for the north in the Civil
War before moving to Texas where he a major force in the Radical
Republican faction that sought to disenfranchise anyone with
obvious Confederate credentials. More than 140 years later,
Democrats and many moderate GOP members view Cruz as a radical
extremist Republican in the wake of a victory that would have
seemed stunning back in March when the primary election would
have been held if not for delays prompted by the courthouse
sword-rattling on redistricting.
But as
tea party crusaders and their more traditional conservative
allies celebrate Cruz's amazing come-from-behind victory in
a primary fight that his chief foe led by a dozen points in
the first vote, the runoff results demonstrated that the Texas
GOP is still a two-party political universe. It's true that
conservatives won a majority of the races where the ideological
line in the sand had been clear. Conservatives - for example
- knocked off two of Texas House Speaker Joe Straus' top lieutenants.
But Republicans who'd been targeted by the tea party like
Ken King, Bennett Ratliff, Jason Villalba and Kyle Kacal prevailed
in Texas House runoffs in a sign that Republicans here aren't
marching in monolithic lockstep to the right.
And then
there's the Democrats, who's most substantial cause for celebration
as a group in the Texas runoff election was arguably Cruz's
victory in the GOP race for U.S. Senate. Sadler and the Democrats
may have one chance in a thousand of beating Ted Cruz in November.
But that's better than no chance at all - which is what their
odds would have been if Dewhurst had emerged as the Republican
nominee.
The election
last week was arguably one of the hardest to call in the state's
often unpredictable political history - and it produced more
surprises than any primary vote in memory. The biennial Capitol
Inside Best of the Texas Primary Runoff Election explains
how a select few of the candidates managed to survive one
of the trickiest tests they've ever faced or ever will.
Drew
Springer
Best Legislative Open Seat Overall
Campaign
Drew
Springer was playing varsity tennis at the University of North
Texas several years before a backup quarterback named Frank
Reich steered the Buffalo Bills to an astonishing victory
in a 1993 playoff game that the Houston Oilers had led by
more than 30 points in the second half. Springer had reached
his mid-thirties by the time David "Big Papi" Ortiz
hit a walkoff home run in extra innings that brought the Boston
Red Sox back to life when they'd been on the brink of elimination
in the only major league baseball series that a team that
had been down 0-3 has ever won.
Those
are widely considered to be the two biggest comebacks in modern
sports history at the national level. But the victory that
Springer pulled off this week in a state House runoff election
when he appeared to be toast has to rank among the most amazing
come-from-behind wins ever in the contact sport of Texas politics.
Blood
sport might be the more fitting term to describe the Republican
overtime fight in House District 68 that Throckmorton rancher
Trent McKnight entered as a heavy favorite after coming within
a hair of winning outright in the May 29 primary election
with 49 percent of the initial vote. Springer - a financial
planner in a family business in a small town near Gainesville
- advanced to the runoff with less than 35 percent of the
spring vote in a race he appeared destined to lose to a rival
who'd been a superior candidate in most every way.
McKnight
galloped into the second round with a long list of advantages
including a war chest with three times more cash than his
rival would muster thanks in large part to family loans of
nearly $350,000 by the time the runoff ended. McKnight had
the support of all the major agriculture groups - and that
alone would seem to be enough to ensure success in a House
race in a northwest Texas district that's predominantly rural.
McKnight had the state's most powerful professional organizations
- the Texas Medical Association and Texas Association of Realtors
- in his corner along with educators, architects, apartment
owners, oil and gas, rural cooperatives and racetrack owners
who hope to build casinos where the ponies run now.
When
Springer trotted out endorsements from conservatives like
Republican State Reps. Phil King of Weatherford and Charles
Perry of Lubbock, McKnight appeared to trump that big time
with vigorous shows of support from GOP celebrities like Governor
Rick Perry and Agriculture Commissioner Todd Staples. McKnight,
who outgoing State Rep. Rick Hardcastle was backing as well,
had the most successful political consultant in Texas history
as a top advisor while Springer had a strategist with minimal
experience compared to the first-round leader's guide. Springer
did have the Austin-based groups that are led by Michael Quinn
Sullivan and mainstays on the right like the Young Conservatives
of Texas and the Texas Right to Life doing what they could
to help a campaign that had lost cause written all over it.
And in the wildly extraordinary primary season of 2012 - which
went on almost four months longer than normal as a repercussion
of an ongoing federal court battle on redistricting - MQS
and YCT were synonyms for tea party. And that gave Springer
some cause for hope - as thin as it may have seemed out the
outset of the runoff to the outside world.
But
Springer still faced a climb that looked steeper than the
Rockies on the political incline scale - and the flimsy rope
he had to work appeared to snap with revelations two weeks
before the runoff election that he'd been arrested on a shoplifting
charge at a Target store in Denton when he was still a college
student in the late 1980s. Springer was sentenced to six months
deferred adjudication for attempting to smuggle a $29.99 Nintendo
game out of the store in his pants. He was placed on six months
probation in a case that appeared to be a belated death sentence
for a campaign that it came back to haunt 22 years later complete
with police station mug shots that spread across the Internet
like a nasty rash.
But
Springer consultant Jordan Berry had a plan to which he planned
to stick despite the potentially fatal distraction at the
worst possible time - and with less than two weeks to go before
the runoff vote - torpedoes suddenly started raining down
on a McKnight campaign. The wrath of hell came in the form
of a series of direct mail bombings that portrayed McKnight
as a liberal Democrat who'd been masquerading as a Republican
and hoping the voters would be dumb enough to buy the act.
The Springer mailers accused McKnight of funneling money to
liberal Democrats who'd been pro-abortion and leaders in Congress
in the fight for Obamacare and voted against tax breaks for
seniors and middle-class families. One mail piece claimed
that McKnight backed gay marriage and pictured him with a
big smile beside a pair of male dolls who were arm-in-arm
and donning tuxedos with pink vests and ascot ties on their
apparent wedding day. The McKnight photo was sandwiched between
President Obama on top and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
with an angry scowl on her face below.
A
second Springer mailer left the impression that he just might
be the most conservative candidate who'd ever run for office.
McKnight, who's hair had grayed considerably since he posed
for the cops at DPD, was pictured in the flyer in front of
a giant heart-shaped stone tablet with the Ten Commandments
printed on it. Springer touted his pro-life and traditional
marriage views and his opposition to Obamacare on the mailer
along with vows to fight for a balanced state budget with
no new taxes and a prohibition against "ALL handouts"
to illegal immigrants who find their way to Texas. The flip
side of the mailer showed Springer decked in a camouflage
shirt and pointing a rifle into the sky with a list of marquee
conservative endorsements on the page down below.
McKnight's
supporters condemned the Springer team tactics to be the most
deplorable, dishonest and disgusting that they'd ever witnessed
on the political battlefield. But when something hits a nerve
like that, it usually means it worked. And Springer's camp
was swatting sticks and stones away with champagne bottles
- or tea cups perhaps in this particular case - after the
distant runner-up in round one soared to a victory in overtime
with 56 percent of the runoff vote.
Springer's
campaign focused an aggressive turnout effort on his home
base of Cooke County, which has the largest population in
the 22-county House district with Gainesville as its biggest
city. Cooke had been the only county Springer carried in May
- and his campaign turned more voters out for the runoff there
than the number who'd cast ballots in the first round. Springer,
who won four counties this week, claimed 83 percent of the
runoff vote in Cooke County after pulling less than 58 percent
in May. So Springer not only persuaded his original voters
to vote in the runoff, he got some of them to bring a friend
or two along to share in the fun.
Honorable
Mention Legislative Open Seat Rural: Kyle
Kacal (HD 12 Republican)
Bennett
Ratliff
Best
Legislative Open Seat Urban
Campaign
One
of the most challenging tests in politics comes when a candidate's
greatest asset also happens to be his or her number one liability.
Take the case of Bennett Ratliff as a prime example - a son
who'd be forced to run in the name of the father if he ever
aspired to be a state legislator. Like it or not.
As
far as the world inside the Austin beltway would be concerned,
Ratliff could expect to be either loved or hated from the
moment his name emerged as a possible candidate for an open
Texas House race in the suburbs of northwest Dallas County.
The very mention of the name Ratliff in state political circles
invoked a deluge emotions and good and bad memories that centered
on the fact that the House District 115 candidate's dad happened
to be Bill Ratliff. The elder Ratliff had been without question
the GOP's most influential state Senate member during a 15-year
stint that began when Democrats ran the show in the Capitol's
east wing and ended when Republicans were firmly in control
there. But to achieve a level of power that was unprecedented
for a Republican when Ratliff the father began climbing the
ladder, he had to forget about partisan loyalty to the point
where he appeared to have none both before and after the GOP
takeover in 1996.
Republican die-hards had found Bill Ratliff's bipartisan ways
begrudgingly acceptable when he gave the GOP the chairs on
the finance and education committees when the Senate majority
and presiding officer were still both Democratic. But the
conservatives who dominated the GOP grassroots base were highly
offended and angered when Ratliff the father continued to
treat Democrats like equals after they put him position to
win a special lieutenant governor's election in 2001 after
the ascension of George W. Bush and Rick Perry to the offices
of president and governor respectively. The GOP faithful thought
it was bad enough when Ratliff the senator was quoted as saying
to the effect of being only 51 percent Republican. That made
sense in the sense that it pretty much reflected the partisan
ratio in the East Texas district he represented before all
the yellow dog Democrats there turned Republican. But that
kind of thinking was old school and archaic for many Texas
Republicans who were eager to dispense more than a century's
worth of partisan payback when the GOP finally replaced the
Democrats as the state's ruling party. During his last term
as a legislator - two years after the brief run in the dais
as the temporary Senate president - Ratliff delivered the
ultimate insult to GOP loyalists when he gave Democrats the
one Republican they needed to block debate on a controversial
midstream congressional redistricting plan in 2003.
So
when the former lawmaker's oldest son entered the race to
replace retiring Republican State Rep. Jim Jackson in a district
that stretched across parts of Irving, Coppell, Carrollton
and Farmers Branch, he would be required to perform a highly
delicate balancing act to have any hopes of winning. The predicament
was complicated even more by the fact that Bennett Ratliff's
younger brother, Thomas Ratliff, had already piqued the wrath
of the father's detractors when he ousted a social conservative
from the State Board of Education two years ago. And Tom would
be on the ballot for re-election when Ben was several slots
down as a state House hopeful.
With
no middle ground on the Ratliff clan in Austin, the family
member in the HD 115 race faced a very difficult task of persuading
voters who'd never heard of his father why they should vote
for him while convincing those who did know about Bill that
Bennett would be his own man as a representative.
The
GOP competition in HD 115 would be intense - arguably moreso
than it turned out to be in any primary on either side of
the aisle on the House battlefield. Matt Rinaldi entered the
race with the full faith and support of conservatives - and
there were more of them than ever with tea party fever at
a boiling point. But the biggest hurdle would turn out to
be Steve Nguyen - an Irving Republican who had a massive war
chest from the outset thanks to an outpouring of support from
fellow optometrists across the state.
Nguyen's
odds appeared to soar when he finished conservatives flocked
to him after he and Ratliff advanced to the runoff with 35
percent and 30 percent of the vote respectively in the May
election when Rinaldi was eliminated with a third-place showing.
But Ratliff, who'd had considerable help in the early going
from some of House Speaker Joe Straus' top lieutenants, had
plenty of reasons to think a come-from-behind victory could
be accomplished including support from groups like the Texas
Medical Association and Texans for Lawsuit Reform and educators
who still viewed his father in a sacred light.
Ratliff
also had the benefit of GOP consultant Bryan Eppstein's team
as the strategy guide - and even though Eppstein and company
suffered some setbacks in the primary election and runoff
- they're usually at their best in the Dallas-Fort Worth area
that happens to be the home base. And they came up with a
potent weapon for Ratliff in the runoff when he pounded the
first-round leader relentlessly amid allegations that Nguyen
had lobbied for Obamacare and served on the board of a national
eye specialists group that gave money to Democrats who'd pushed
the president's health care reform plan through Congress.
While
Nguyen called the accusations untrue and even came up with
evidence to refute them, the introduction of Obama in the
GOP runoff gave Ratliff a way to distract attention from charges
that he'd raised taxes multiple times as a Coppell school
board member over the course of the past nine years.
There's
no way to know how much the Republican runoff in HD 115 was
a referendum on the Ratliffs as a political family and its
legendary patriarch. But that's a moot point now in the wake
of Bennett Ratliff's victory over Nguyen in last week's runoff
election with almost 52 percent of the vote.
Honorable
Mention Legislative Open Seat Urban: Philip
Cortez (HD 117 Democrat), Stephanie Klick (HD 91 Republican),
Jeff Leach (HD 67 Republican), Jason Villalba (HD 114 Republican)
Ken
King
Best Legislative Challenger Campaign
The
Republican runoff in House District 88 was a modern day range
war that put the north against the south in a geographical
concoction that stretches 300 miles from the western edge
of the South Plains to the northwest corner of the Panhandle.
So maybe it's fitting that the candidate who won it turned
out to be the one who looked most like a cowboy in the campaign
literature and television ads. And while the names of the
key places had no bearing on the outcome of the runoff or
any aspect of it, there's some poetic intrigue perhaps in
the fact that winning candidate from the north resides in
a town called Canadian while the incumbent who lost lives
in a place called Hale.
That's
Hale County to be specific - the largest of 17 counties in
HD 88 and the only one that State Rep. Jim Landtroop of Plainview
has represented during a one-term stint that will end when
Ken King takes the oath of office in January.
But
while King the rancher who rode his horse a lot in TV spots
beat Landtroop the insurance agent with 54 percent of the
vote in last week's runoff election - the GOP showdown in
HD 88 was more of a high-level chess match that revolved on
a variety of factors than a simple shootout at some O.K. Coral.
The HD 88 fight was the hottest House race in the state by
most any measuring standard - and while Landtroop was one
of three incumbent House Republicans who lost in round two
compared to only one who survived it - it's significant to
note that he was the only one in that group who'd been on
the wrong side in the speaker's election early last year.
Landtroop
- one of 15 conservative Republicans who voted against Speaker
Joe Straus in his bid for a second term as House leader in
2011 - emerged from his first session with a redesigned district
that was all foreign territory to him with the exception of
his home base of Hale County. But Landtroop got a major break
when State Rep. Warren Chisum - a veteran GOP lawmaker who
represents the district into which the rookie had been shuffled
- decided to run for the Texas Railroad Commission instead
of seeking re-election in an area where he would've won easily
despite the new map pairing.
Landtroop's
conservative credentials and tea party support didn't scare
off the competition, however, as a former legislator from
the south part of the redrawn district and a businessman from
a wealthy family in the same city where Chisum lives joined
King on the list of challengers in a race that had fireworks
potential written all over it from day one. The early speculation
had King as a possible last place finisher in the initial
election - even though that notion evaporated quickly when
the money started rolling in.
Thanks
largely to an infusion of loans from family members and one
very generous supporter, King had the most money for the first
round that ended when he claimed 30 percent of the vote with
a second place finish in the May election that Landtroop led
with 34 percent. King would end up raising more than $830,000
before the final week of the runoff - more than double the
amount that Landtroop had rounded up for his first re-election
bid. But both of the surviving candidates knew that the way
they would spent their money would be more important than
the actual quantity count - and both had top-flight consultants
out of Austin who could show them how to get bang for their
bucks while maximizing intangibles with values that can't
be appraised on the monetary scale.
Landtroop
had strong support from the same anti-Straus conservatives
who knocked off several speaker allies this year - and he
jumped on the opportunity to paint King as a moderate by accusing
him of backing tax and spending hikes as a small town school
board member. Landtroop's camp tried to drive that nail into
the coffin it envisioned by posting a video on YouTube that
showed an excerpt from a King quote at a campaign forum in
which he appeared to be acknowledging his vulnerability to
attacks on tax votes. King contended that the clip had been
edited selectively in a way designed to take his remarks out
of context - and he countered the charges effectively by portraying
Landtroop as a useless piece of legislative furniture with
a do-nothing record in his first House session.
Landtroop
responded by touting an anti-abortion amendment he'd persuaded
the House to add to a Medicaid bill - and he credited the
move with forcing a dozen Planned Parenthood clinics out of
business. What Landtroop didn't realize was that the family
planning organization that he'd hoped to torpedo would initiate
a networking effort behind the scenes with the specific goal
of payback.
Landtroop
- like other conservative GOP lawmakers in competitive primary
battles - had a parade of statewide officials including Governor
Rick Perry, Attorney General Greg Abbott and Comptroller Susan
Combs filing through the district with endorsements for him.
But King trumped Landtroop's support from Austin-based statewide
leaders with endorsements that were arguably more valuable
from the two Republicans who failed to make the runoff and
Chisum himself in the runoff's waning days. Chisum, who was
on the runoff ballot in the RRC race, went ballistic on Landtroop,
branding him as a liar who'd distorted King's record as a
school trustee with a campaign that he found utterly disgusting.
While
the firestorm of insults and allegations commanded the headlines,
both campaigns knew that the one who did the better job of
identifying supporters and turning them out in the dog heat
of summer would probably win. One of the candidates who'd
been eliminated in May was from the northern half of the district
while the other lives in its far southern reaches. But both
of them had endorsed King - and that made the geographical
playing field in a classic regional confrontation a little
more uneven for the incumbent in a district that was new turf
for him already. While both candidates had top-rate strategists,
the firm that's led by Craig Murphy and Chris Turner prevailed
in this particular fight as King's consultant.
Landtroop
as expected carried Hale County. But King took a major step
in the right direction when he received more than twice as
many votes in Hale County as he had in May while the incumbent's
support there was almost the same. King appeared to seal the
victory, however, with his performance in the runoff in Castro,
Briscoe and Swisher counties - the three counties that are
squeezed smack dab in the middle as the defining line between
the north and the south in HD 88. Landtroop had won all three
middle-ground counties in the first primary election before
King captured Briscoe and Castro in the runoff and came within
two votes of winning Swisher as well.
With
no Democrat in the running, King is the new king of the mountain
in the northernmost reaches of the Lone Star State.
Honorable
Mention Legislative Challenger: Donna Campbell (SD
25 Republican), J.D. Sheffield (HD 59 Republican), Travis
Clardy (HD 11 Republican)
J.M.
Lozano
Best Legislative Incumbent Campaign
South
Texas State Rep. J.M. Lozano is the winner in this category
by default - the only incumbent to emerge victoriously from
a Republican primary runoff with a victory and hopes for another
term still on track. But the fact that Lozano has no competition
for this particular honor makes his win over Bill T. Wilson
of Portland in overtime all the more impressive and telling
about the quality of the campaign he ran in round two in his
first re-election bid and debut as a Republican candidate.
Lozano
had encountered predictable resistance and suspicion during
the first round from Republicans who saw him as the ultimate
opportunist in light of his decision to switch parties in
March before the ink had dried on a federal court map that
gave House District 43 a slight GOP tilt for the first time.
Some loyal Republicans didn't like the idea that Lozano had
actually spent more time running for a second term as a Democrat
than he had as a newly-converted GOP member. Despite a big
cash advantage and support from marquee party leaders that
had rolled out the red carpet, Lozano led Wilson by less than
one percentage point in the May 29 primary election when they
advanced to overtime as Willie Vaden was eliminated with a
distant third place showing.
The
alterations that HD 43 had undergone on a map that the Legislature
had approved last year had prompted Lozano to move from Kingsville
to Alice where one of the WingStop franchises he owns is located.
But a federal three-judge panel in San Antonio shuffled San
Patricio County where Wilson and Vaden are based into HD 43
on an interim map that compelled Lozano to change his party
affiliation right before an extended filing deadline. San
Patricio became the largest county in Lozano's district as
well as the most Republican - and the two challengers claimed
almost 56 percent of the first round vote while the incumbent
finished with just over 44 percent and a fragile lead that
would be tough to hold in the runoff.
Despite
his new friends in high stations in Austin and the money they
could bring to the table, Lozano had plenty of cause for concern
in a four-county district where his old home base of Kleberg
County was the only area he'd represented in his brief career
as a legislator. San Patrico voters had cast half the votes
that were recorded in the GOP primary in HD 43 in May - and
Wilson had almost two more months to pitch his campaign as
a first-time candidate in a race against an incumbent who'd
been labeled as a moderate by tea party conservatives who
don't trust party-switchers.
One
of Lozano's first moves as a Republican had been to hire consultant
Steve Ray, who's emerged in recent years as the top GOP strategist
in South Texas. Ray, a former reporter for the Corpus Christi
newspaper and the chain that owns it, knew that Lozano probably
wouldn't survive if he depended exclusively on establishment
Republicans and independents for support in his maiden voyage
with his new party. So Lozano's camp reached out to Democrats
- and despite the inevitable harsh criticism that would come
from hard-core Democratic loyalists - the incumbent persuaded
a significant number to cross party lines to support him in
the first election this spring and the runoff this summer
if they hadn't voted in the Democratic primary in May.
Lozano
pinned the recruiting push on the assertion that the GOP was
more in sync with conservative Hispanics who'd been accustomed
to voting for Democrats simply because their parents and grandparents
had. Lozano's redesigned district surrounded the Corpus Christi
area, which had evolved from a traditional Democratic stronghold
into an area where Republicans had leveled the playing field
in the past few years. Two-thirds of the residents in the
new version of HD 43 are Latino - and while a majority of
Hispanics were still Democrats - Lozano's team made crossover
support one of its highest priorities and contends now that
the effort was highly successful.
But
Lozano got a couple of crucial breaks that helped propel him
to victory in a runoff election that three GOP House colleagues
and one incumbent Republican state senator all ended up losing.
Conservatives who've fiercely opposed Speaker Joe Straus didn't
come after Lozano as hard as they did in other races involving
some of the House leader's other allies in competitive Republican
primaries. The tea party apparently didn't see a moderate
Latino in a Hispanic district in a race against an Anglo rival
as vulnerable as some of the other incumbents that conservatives
targeted and beat. Lozano hit the jackpot when his team discovered
that Wilson was getting a substantial amount of money through
a political action committee that trial lawyers were funding.
The incumbent's team seized on the trial lawyers' emergence
in round two and made it appear radioactive - despite the
fact that the same plaintiffs attorneys had support Lozano
when he'd run as a Democrat in 2010.
Lozano
had picked up endorsements from several GOP statewide officers
including Governor Rick Perry and Attorney General Greg Abbott,
who's been highly popular with conservatives. Perry touted
the trial lawyer ties to the incumbent's opponent when he
appeared at a Lozano rally shortly before the runoff vote
in a move that drew Wilson's wrath and helped seal his defeat.
Lozano's team also sought to exploit a promise that Wilson
had ostensibly made to teachers about supporting moves to
raise taxes on their behalf - and that compelled Vaden to
rally behind the incumbent in round two.
While
incumbents who'd finished in first in May were dropping like
tenpins in other parts of the state, Lozano substantially
better in the runoff than he had in round one when he staved
off the challenge with more than 54 percent of the vote. The
celebration won't last long, however, with former Texas House
member Yvonne Gonzalez Toureilles of Alice waiting in the
wings as the Democratic nominee in a district where she'll
have a decent shot at reclaiming a seat she lost in the GOP
tsunami two years ago.
Honorable
Mention Legislative Incumbent: None
Filemon
Vela
Best Congressional Campaign
The
bridges go up in flames behind most people in politics who
have the audacity to switch parties - especially in a place
like the Rio Grande Valley that's the only remaining Democratic
stronghold in Texas outside of El Paso and minority neighborhoods
in the state's largest cities. But most people aren't Filemon
"Blue Eyes" Vela - a Brownsville attorney who's
a maestro without rival when it comes to playing both sides
of the political fence.
In
a race that was barely a blip on Austin radar screens, Vela
put on a clinic on how to put a viable campaign together in
no time and how to make sure that you win and win big once
you do. Vela had the bloodlines and name identification as
the product of a South Texas family with a father who served
as a federal judge and a mother who used to be the mayor of
Brownsville. And Vela had patience as someone who would wait
until he had a pretty good idea of what the playing field
would look like in a race for a new congressional seat that
other aspiring politicians in his neck of the woods had entered
months before they knew where the boundaries would be.
While
money wouldn't be a problem for a highly-successful trial
lawyer with a big bank account and lots of rich friends, Vela
had one little potential glitch he'd have to work out when
he was on the verge of entering the race for the U.S. House
in an area that a federal court would designate as Congressional
District 34. Vela had been voting in GOP primaries ever since
his wife became a Republican six years ago en route to winning
a seat on the 13th Court of Appeals that's based in Corpus
Christi where Democrats had been jumping ship in droves. But
Vela hadn't ever really become a loyal Republican - and he'd
soured some on the GOP when Governor Rick Perry passed on
an opportunity to appoint Judge Rose Vela to a state Supreme
Court seat that she'd been planning to seek before it became
open. Vela nonetheless knew he could expect to die-hard Democrats
to splatter him with opportunist accusations if and when he
jumped in the fight for Congress in a district that would
be all but impossible to win as a the GOP nominee.
But
Vela was willing to gamble that he could persuade Democrats
that he was still one of them even though he'd been sleeping
with the enemy for a while. So Vela quietly assembled a core
base of support while potential primary rivals were running
into each other on maps that kept changing - and he had Democratic
mega-donor Mikal Watts and other powerhouse names from the
trial lawyer ranks and business establishment in his corner
ready to roll by the time he launched his campaign in CD 34.
When Vela encountered the immediate and inevitable questions
about his party hopping, he served up a simple answer. He
loves his wife and puts family above politics - so what might
have looked like partisan betrayal on the surface was simply
a case of a man standing by his woman. A Tammy Wynette with
genders reversed. But Vela didn't have time to waste on the
subject of his past because he was too busy taking shots at
the GOP and explaining to voters that votes that Republicans
in Congress had been taking on issues they understood like
taxes and welfare had exposed a vein of right-wing extremism
that hadn't been so apparent when during the time that he'd
strayed.
Three
months after signing up for the race, Vela captured more than
40 percent of the vote in the May primary election while seven
other Democrats split the rest. Denise Saenz Blanchard - a
former chief of staff to Solomon Ortiz before his U.S. House
stint ended - qualified for a spot in the CD 34 runoff with
less than 13 percent of the spring vote. She was good candidate
who has what it takes to win if she picks the right fights.
But the spring vote count in CD 34 was as close as the race
would get.
Saenz
Blanchard had raised $176,000 heading into the final week
of the runoff campaign - about one thousand bucks more than
Vela had loaned his campaign on top almost $240,000 that supporters
had donated. The HD 34 contest wasn't really a race by the
time it ended this week when Vela was showered with two out
of every three voters that were cast in overtime.
Vela
has one more hurdle to clear this fall with must overcome
opposition this fall with Brownsvile tea party activist Jessica
Puente Blanchard as the GOP nominee in the wake of a victory
that she posted with 55 percent of the runoff vote. But that
should be a cakewalk for a guy with a Frank Sinatra nickname
and all the reasons in the world to think he's going to win
in a district where Democrats won 57 percent of the vote in
the last two statewide elections and fared even better down-ballot.
Several
state lawmakers could make compelling cases for consideration
in the highly subjective competition of campaign performance
ratings in the congressional category. Republican State Rep.
Randy Weber of Pearland led from start to finish in a redesigned
U.S House district where he won the runoff with 63 percent
of the vote in a battle with a hometown city council member
who'd been part of the GOP's grassroots women army. State
Reps. Pete Gallego of Alpine and Marc Veasey of Fort Worth
scored solid victories over former lawmakers in open Democratic
congressional primaries that garnered more attention outside
the areas they unfolded than any other second-round fights
for the U.S. House in Texas.
Gallego
had to overcome a five-point spring deficit in a fight with
San Antonio's Ciro Rodriguez, a former state legislator who'd
been in and out of Congress throughout most of the past two
decades. Gallego claimed 55 percent of the runoff vote to
set the stage for a November showdown with freshman Republican
U.S. Rep. Francisco "Quico" Canseco in a district
where Democrats think they can win. Veasey - an African-American
who's a product of the machine Martin Frost assembled as a
powerhouse congressman - will be heavily favored this fall
in a race for a new U.S. House seat in the Dallas-Fort Worth
area after surviving a vicious brawl with ex-Texas House member
Domingo Garcia with a win in round two with 53 percent.
But
the runoff foes that Veasey and Gallego defeated were both
seriously damaged long before the battles they entered in
2012. Garcia had alienated too many fellow Democrats with
an aggressive style and combative tactics - and Democratic
leaders and voters had simply lost confidence in Rodriguez
as someone who'd won two separate congressional seats and
lost both of them while failing to distinguish himself on
any particular issue.
So
Vela the blue-eyed blue dog Democrat who'd been cozy with
Republicans before he turned against them suddenly a few months
ago is the winner here.
Honorable
Mention Congressional Campaign: Pete Gallego (CD
23 Democrat), Randy Weber (CD 14 Republican) Marc Veasey (CD
33 Democrat)
Ted
Cruz
Best Statewide Campaign
It's
tough to say exactly how much actual credit Ted Cruz deserves
for his earth-rattling runoff victory in the U.S. Senate race
compared to the role that incredible good luck and other factors
that his team couldn't control or affect.
The
former solicitor general's greatest admirers would be disingenuous
or delusional if they attempt to dismiss or play down the
significance and impact that timing had on the final outcome
in the battle between Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst and
Cruz for the GOP nomination in the top race on the runoff
ballot. The overriding consensus since it became apparent
that Cruz had a good chance to win has been that Dewhurst
would have waltzed to a relatively easy victory in round one
under normal circumstances in a typical election year when
the primary season is four months shorter than it turned out
to be in 2012. A prolonged federal court fight that Democrats
initiated effectively bought Cruz the extra time that he needed
to introduce himself to the electorate, to demonstrate his
potential and to generate a sufficient amount of funding to
be competitive in a race against an opponent whose personal
fortune seems infinite at times.
While
we'll never know, Cruz might have destined for a third-place
finish behind former Dallas Mayor Tom Leppert in the first
primary election if it had been held on schedule in early
March instead of being shoved to the last week in May by the
redistricting chess match. Former football star and television
analyst Craig James might have given Cruz some competition
for third in the absence of the map battle that strung the
process in mid-summer. The Democrats who took GOP leaders
and legislators to court on redistricting were trying to cut
their losses in the Legislature - and they were modestly successful
in that regard. But the decision by Attorney General Greg
Abbott - ostensibly with the blessings of House Speaker Joe
Straus and Dewhurst, the Texas Senate's presiding officer
- to challenge the first set of alternative court maps for
the Legislature and congressional delegations all but guaranteed
that the primary election and runoff would be delayed. And
the primary voting was pushed back again when the Republican
state attorney general prevailed at the U.S. Supreme Court.
Abbott had been a mentor and role model as the statewide official
who gave Cruz the job that became the centerpiece of his campaign
resume. Cruz spent a year running for attorney general when
it appeared that Abbott might be moving up the chain in a
domino effect from an early Hutchison retirement that never
materialized. Cruz dropped the plan the moment it became obvious
that Abbott wouldn't be leaving the AG's office as soon as
some had expected. Cruz dropped Abbott's name repeatedly as
a candidate - and even though the attorney general had the
good sense to stay out of the U.S. Senate fray - the link
to Cruz has spawned conspiracy theories on whether Abbott
had been trying to sandbag the primary with the redistricting
maneuvering in an attempt to help his protege and possibly
himself. Abbott - as it turned out - was the only high-ranking
elected state leader who emerged without any blemishes from
a U.S. Senate that most of the GOP's other statewide officials
jumped into on Dewhurst's behalf.
The
truth is that Abbott didn't think Cruz had a chance against
Dewhurst in the early stages of the federal contest when he
was in the process of making the decision to steer forced
the redistricting battle to the nation's highest court and
defending the maps that lawmakers had drawn there late last
year. But conspiracies are a lot sexier than coincidence in
the political speculation genre especially when events defy
convention like the Cruz win.
While
timing was absolutely critical in terms of the campaign's
duration and Cruz's emergence at the perfect time, he probably
couldn't have won the race without the luxury of a powerful
national movement to which he could hitch his star when it
was reaching a new peak. Republicans had won primaries in
races for the U.S. Senate and Congress in other states this
year with substantial support from an energized conservative
base with a jazzy new name. But Cruz became the tea party's
top national poster guy because the anti-establishment voters
and established leaders who'd gotten out in front of the parade
saw more star quality and marketability in the U.S. Senate
contender here. Cruz wouldn't have been able to swim anywhere
near as far as the wave carried him. Cruz - ironically perhaps
- was the darling of the same rank-and-file forces that had
never been that crazy about the idea of electing Hispanics
to high stations in Texas. While Cruz is an American native
of Cuban descent, he has no obviously identifiable Latino
characteristics beyond a Spanish surname that a lot of Anglos
don't recognize immediately as Hispanic. Ted Cruz could've
been Tom Cruise's cousin as far as some voters could tell.
There's
no denying that the stars has to align perfectly before Cruz
could beat a primary opponent who was loaded with money, tireless,
extremely intelligent, incomparably dedicated to public suffer
and steeped in a wealth of experience as a former land commissioner
who's run the state Senate with impressive results as the
lieutenant governor for almost 10 years. Dewhurst seemed to
be about as qualified as it gets for a U.S. Senate race. Dewhurst,
however, has a unique personality that comes across as awkward
- and the more he tries to behave like a regular like he did
often in televised debates and public appearances - it looks
contrived to a lot of average voters on the surface. Dewhurst
was often his own worst enemy - and Cruz helped him along
on that whenever he saw the opportunity.
Whatever
part extraneous circumstances and luck might have played Cruz
vs. Dewhurst, it would remiss for the post-mortem appraisers
to refuse to acknowledge the fact that the guy who won the
runoff made all the right moves and very few mistakes en route
to the finish line that he crossed in a blaze of blinding
speed. Cruz made the most of the two-month window of opportunity
he had to close a 12-point deficit - and victory appeared
to be inevitable by the time he nailed down the nomination
with almost 57 pecent of the vote as a thundering exclamation
mark.
Cruz
couldn't have won the U.S. Senate runoff on tea party love
alone. He had to position himself perfectly to capitalize
on one-of-a-kind original political climate - and he had to
pull off the sales job of the century to overcome the myriad
of disadvantages he faced in what seemed mission impossible
when it began. Cruz oozed a white-hot passion on the stump
- and he served it up with a measured intemperance when performing
in the cooler medium of TV during a record number of debates
that he'd win every time as an experienced trial lawyer who
had to be brimming with confidence when he came from the womb.
Cruz
assembled a first-flight team of advisors that included Jason
Johnson, an Austin consultant who's been Abbott's top outside
strategist since his emergence as a statewide political superstar.
And when the going got really tough - like it did with relentless
attacks that centered on past legal clients including a Chinese
tire distributor who'd been accused of pirating American ingenuity
and a private prison developer who a grieving mother blamed
for her son's suicide in a pro-Dewhurst super PAC ad in the
campaign final days - Cruz remained undaunted, unbowed and
unapologetic.
Cruz
spent minimal time deflecting the attacks on his legal business
- refusing to be backed into the trap of a defensive posture
while concentrating on offense with what appeared to be a
singular central objective. With the establishment overwhelmingly
behind Dewhurst, Cruz found ways to turn his opponent's base
of support and extensive experience into major liabilities
as he portrayed the lieutenant governor as a tax-and-spend
moderate who epitomized the status quo that tea party crusaders
despise.
Cruz didn't win because he happen to come along with tea party
fever was reaching a boiling point. He won because he figured
out how to tap into it and channel it in customized fashion
for a campaign like none that had ever been run before in
Texas with any degree of success. While Cruz will be heavily
favored against Democratic nominee Paul Sadler in the general
election, Democrats are thanking their stars that he's the
nominee instead of the party establishment's choice. Democrats
are hoping that independents and moderate Republicans will
conclude that Cruz is a dangerous extremist if they haven't
already - and if President Obama finds a way to do as well
in Texas as he did four years ago ... well, you get the picture.
Honorable
Mention Statewide Campaign: Christi Craddick (Texas
Railroad Commission Republican)
Empower
Texans
Best Organizational Effort
Ten
years years have gone by since Texas Senate member Bill Ratliff
likened conservatives who'd targeted him and other moderate
Republicans to Nazis, skinheads, the KKK, Al Queda and the
Taliban. But that might be sugarcoating compared to how Republicans
who've come under attack from the right in today's Texas feel
about Michael Quinn Sullivan, who's emerged in recent years
as the most aggressive and confrontational conservative activist
in a state that's become tantamount to tea party heaven. The
GOP candidates on Sullivan's hit list might be more inclined
to refer to him simply as the devil.
Sullivan
- the president of the Empower Texans PAC and the sister group
Texans for Fiscal Responsibility - has found that the level
of wrath that he draws goes up in direct correlation with
the amount of success that he and conservative allies achieve
in high-priority races on the critical legislative battleground.
Sullivan - as a consequence - can assume that he's more unpopular
now in the eyes of his enemies than ever thanks to a banner
primary season that he capped off with an exclamation point
in the runoff election last week.
Regarded
not long ago by some Republicans as a noisy and obnoxious
wing-nut with more bark than bite, Sullivan cemented his reputation
as the state's most prominent RINO hunter when the groups
that he leads posted a half dozen wins against three losses
in GOP runoff races in which they intervened.
Empower
Texans rallied behind Republican House hopefuls Stephanie
Klick of Fort Worth, Jeff Leach of Plano, Travis Clardy of
Nacogdoches, Drew Springer of Muenster and Greg Bonnen of
Friendwsood in runoffs battles that they ended up winning
at the polls last week. Sullivan's forces sided with conservatives
in more than three dozen legislative contests in the first
and second rounds - and they won about three times as many
races as they lost in the initial election and the runoff.
Empower Texans suffered key setbacks when Republican State
Reps. Jim Landtroop of Plainview and Sid Miller of Stephenvile
were unseated by GOP challengers and Tucker Anderson of Calvert
fell short in a race for a new House seat against a rival
who'd finished second in May.
But
Miller's defeat may have seem more bittersweet than sour from
Sullivan's point of view when considering that the incumbent
was one of the few if not the only member of House Speaker
Joe Straus' leadership team that had the conservative activist's
official support in the runoff. Sullivan has been the speaker's
chief nemesis since he led an unsuccessful move to oust Straus
from the leadership position at the start of the regular session
last year. While Miller had backed Straus and defended him
vigorously in the face of attacks by conservative groups and
leaders from outside the chamber, Empower Texans offered to
endorse the incumbent as a result of an undeniably conservative
voting record in the House for more than a decade. Gatesville
physician J.D. Sheffield, who beat Miller in the runoff, made
that decision easier when he accepted campaign cash in overtime
from groups that often back Democrats like the pro-education
Texas Parent PAC.
Sullivan's
groups don't attempt to help candidates they favor by flooding
their campaigns with money. Empower Texans PAC foot the bill
for candidate advertising and voter contact in the form of
automated robo calls, campaign buttons and a series of town
hall conference calls in which voters participated. Sullivan's
groups provide a wealth of information on their web sites
and emails about the candidates it supports and opposes. But
the most valuable element that Sullivan brings to the table
arguably is the brand name certification that candidates are
truly conservative in a state where every Republican swears
that they are or runs the risk of perishing.
Sullivan
didn't be daunted or slowed in the runoff by complaints that
two of Straus' top lieutenants filed at the Texas Ethics Commission
against before he helped beat one of them at the ballot box
in the May primary election. He's like a political energizer
bunny on steroids when it comes to the causes he holds dear.
Honorable
Mention Organizational Effort: Texas Parent PAC,
Texans for Lawsuit Reform, Texas Medical Association